<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Finglas/Glasnevin residents win on appeal against 3G mast</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.briangreene.com/bhg/2007/finglasglasnevin-residents-win-on-appeal-against-3g-mast/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.briangreene.com/bhg/2007/finglasglasnevin-residents-win-on-appeal-against-3g-mast/</link>
	<description>&#160;  &#160;  &#160; &#38; The Great Anti-Theft Movement &#160;  &#160;  &#160;</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 00:47:29 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Brian Greene</title>
		<link>http://www.briangreene.com/bhg/2007/finglasglasnevin-residents-win-on-appeal-against-3g-mast/#comment-26054</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Greene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2007 19:36:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.briangreene.com/bhg/2007/finglasglasnevin-residents-win-on-appeal-against-3g-mast/#comment-26054</guid>
		<description>nursing home</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nursing home</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cian</title>
		<link>http://www.briangreene.com/bhg/2007/finglasglasnevin-residents-win-on-appeal-against-3g-mast/#comment-26046</link>
		<dc:creator>Cian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2007 21:11:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.briangreene.com/bhg/2007/finglasglasnevin-residents-win-on-appeal-against-3g-mast/#comment-26046</guid>
		<description>Oh, come on. They might have won, but it wasn’t on the radiation-like - “by reason of bulk, prominence and rooftop location, would be visually obtrusive”.

Looking at the picture you have posted above a mast might even make that place look better :)

Seriously, in this case was Three’s planned phone mast close to a school or playground etc or what exactly was the group’s problem with it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, come on. They might have won, but it wasn’t on the radiation-like - “by reason of bulk, prominence and rooftop location, would be visually obtrusive”.</p>
<p>Looking at the picture you have posted above a mast might even make that place look better <img src='http://www.briangreene.com/bhg/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Seriously, in this case was Three’s planned phone mast close to a school or playground etc or what exactly was the group’s problem with it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
